21st December 2024

On the Cash: Can You Have Too A lot Cash? Brian Portnoy, Shaping Wealth (September 18, 2024)

Can cash purchase you happiness? How a lot cash is an excessive amount of? Does wealth provide diminishing returns? On this version of On the Cash, I sit down with Brian Portnoy to discover these questions. 

Full transcript beneath.

~~~

About this week’s visitor:

Brian Portnoy is founder and CEO of Shaping Wealth, which helps advisors and their purchasers to attain “funded contentment,” and operates as an outsourced Chief Behavioral Officer. Portnoy has held senior funding roles all through the hedge fund and mutual fund industries.

For more information, see:

Shaping Wealth Bio

LinkedIn

Twitter

~~~

Discover all the earlier On the Cash episodes within the MiB feed on Apple Podcasts, YouTube, Spotify, and Bloomberg.

Transcript

[Music: As a result of I’m joyful.  Clap alongside in the event you really feel like a room with no roof, As a result of I’m joyful,  Clap alongside in the event you really feel like happiness is the reality, As a result of I’m joyful]

Barry Ritholtz: Cash doesn’t routinely result in happiness. Our relationship with cash is sophisticated: Converse to somebody on the backside of the financial ladder and they’re going to let you know in no unsure phrases {that a} lack of cash can result in distress; however communicate to sufficient millionaires and billionaires and it’s fairly clear that cash doesn’t routinely result in happiness.

Because it seems, Cash buys you slightly little bit of happiness, however solely up to some extent. On right now’s version of on the cash, we’re going to debate how and why cash should buy you happiness.

To assist us unpack all of this and what it means on your monetary well being, let’s usher in Brian Portnoy. He’s the creator of “The Geometry of Wealth: Methods to Form a Lifetime of Cash and That means.”

We’ll begin with a simple sufficient query does cash purchase happiness?

Brian Portnoy: Let me offer you a quite simple clear reply sure no perhaps form of not likely form of

Barry Ritholtz: OK, I get that. So that you’re saying it’s sophisticated and it actually is dependent upon a whole lot of a whole lot of components let’s begin actually fundamental with Maslow’s hierarchy of wants: Security, safety, meals, shelter, et cetera. Clearly in the event you don’t have these issues lack of cash is definitely going to carry distress

Brian Portnoy: In order that’s precisely the correct place to begin let’s discuss in regards to the elimination of distress as distinct from the achievement of happiness there’s little question that cash’s strongest influence on our emotional lives our bodily lives is the elimination of distress so we’re constructed to to outlive that’s our evolutionary story and cash buys us shelter it buys us meals it buys us heat it buys us security at the next degree it might probably permit us to afford eliminating aggravation or sure individuals you don’t need to see or sure commutes you don’t need to make we will consider cash as a strategy to mitigate and even remove disappointment disappointment and distress that’s by far essentially the most highly effective relationship between cash and a selected emotional state

Barry Ritholtz: So I’ve seen a few research that take a look at the place does cash cease shopping for contentment so to talk and I I do know these are all from totally different eras and they also might not be inflation adjusted numbers however one examine says it peaks round 70Okay after which begins to roll off that looks like in America that buys you shelter meals clothes well being care and perhaps even some training then I’ve seen 300,000 and 500,000 the place does the marginal utility of every earned greenback actually start to matter much less and fewer?

Brian Portnoy: So that you’ve pointed precisely to quite a few research on this and perhaps it’s 75,000 or 90,000 I’d additionally level out {that a} greenback spent in Manhattan NY versus Manhattan KS these are very totally different conversations.

Let me intervene first although and say there’s two totally different definitions of happiness that we should always be sure that are clear one is form of simply the day-to-day: Good temper, dangerous temper having you already know constructive feelings. The opposite form of happiness going again to Aristotle what he known as “Eudemonia” is a deeper supply of which means and contentment because it pertains to the primary definition of happiness you might be appropriate there’s been examine after examine that exhibits that when you possibly can afford the fundamentals in life having that marginal greenback isn’t essentially going to place you in a very good temper or a nasty temper you’re form of wired with a sure you already know disposition and in the event you’re a typically cheerful individual you’re going to be that manner and in the event you’re typically form of dower or depressing nicely making a whole lot of hundreds of {dollars} a 12 months aren’t going to make an influence.

I’d go to the second definition of what we name happiness it’s a it’s a tough phrase you go to the thesaurus there’s thirty totally different phrases for this factor however we’re going to speak about day-to-day happiness versus “Contentment” what Aristotle known as “Eudaimonia” and there’s some attention-grabbing analysis from Danny Kahneman and Angus Deaton that exhibits that if spent properly, cash can underwrite a significant life, and there are totally different sources of which means in our lives. When spent properly on sure forms of experiences and relationships cash can very a lot be used successfully to steer a happier, higher life

Barry Ritholtz: Let’s discuss slightly bit about different individuals there’s a well-known HL Mencken quote was as soon as they requested how do you outline wealth and his reply was $100 greater than my brother-in-law. There’s different research which have requested individuals would you relatively I’m making up these numbers however they’re ballpark $60,000 whenever you reside in a city when all people else has $50,000 or would you favor $200,000 in a city the place all people else has $300,000. I do know what I might select I might take the latter however that doesn’t appear to be the reply that most individuals give. They are saying nicely I’d relatively be the wealthiest man on the town at 60Okay than the poorest man on the town, at 100Okay. Why is that? Clarify why that habits and perception system exist and what does that imply for our satisfaction

Brian Portnoy: Welcome to the human situation. Welcome to the evolutionary path that we’ve been on. Standing issues, tribe issues, and these aren’t trivial issues these are deep down genetic codes that all of us reside with and so when we now have slightly bit greater than others we really feel higher than ourselves and so that you’re completely proper the research do present and I don’t have the precise numbers that folks would relatively have $100,000 revenue when others are making $80okay versus $150,000 revenue when others are making $200,000 a 12 months.

You and I’d say nicely I’d choose one versus the opposite, however the reality is that the preponderance of responses replicate the truth that we need to really feel related to our tribe and protected in our tribe and when you may have slightly bit greater than others it might probably make you’re feeling fairly good go quote for quote you gave me H.L. Menken I’ll provide the authentic JP Morgan he mentioned nothing corrupts your monetary judgment greater than the sight of your neighbor getting wealthy

Barry Ritholtz: I’ve a really vivid recollection in within the early days of home flipping within the 2000s main as much as the GFC, and within the early days of crypto. I can’t let you know how typically I’ve heard individuals say “My neighbor is making all this cash and that man’s a moron,” it’s nearly as if it’s insult to harm — what’s it about seeing any person else make some huge cash that will get our envy and greed buttons working?

Brian Portnoy: I don’t know whether or not to cite neuroscience or the Bible [Go both ways, I bet they’re related]. They’re, they’re. You communicate to form of who we’re as a human species – there there’s no getting round the truth that we really feel envy or greed when others have extra. I don’t know if we have to present a dissertation or Bible quotes to indicate why that’s true; we simply know that when others are getting forward, we really feel like we’re falling behind.

It’s actually necessary from a monetary well-being perspective for individuals to have their very own particular person genuine objectives hopefully baked into some type of a monetary plan. So you’re feeling such as you’re making progress towards the issues that you just’ve mentioned matter to you and your family members. That can be utilized to mitigate a few of these unfavorable emotional impacts, when it’s identical to, I’m on the on line casino I wager on black he wager on pink he received he’s wealthy I’m not and also you don’t really feel superb about your self.

That that’s not an effective way to work your manner by your monetary life

Barry Ritholtz: So let’s tie this collectively given the distinction between the pursuit of happiness and the pursuit of contentment what does this imply for the way buyers ought to take into consideration pursuing positive aspects of their portfolios.

Brian Portnoy: Investing exterior of a well-defined monetary plan is concept. And which may not essentially be a nasty factor you already know you want to choose shares not anymore I began started on a buying and selling desk however look I take round with market timing is what I do however that’s simply exterior {of professional} that’s simply in my very own little silly yeah you possibly can’t private account OK so I’ll begin and by the way in which that that 2% of my belongings scratches such an itch. I can’t start to let you know yeah that’s why we advise advisors to all the time permit some purchasers to have cowboy accounts completely you We’ll handle 97% of your belongings 3% go wild purchase crypto all these items and

Barry Ritholtz: One of many humorous issues are is with these form of accounts is that if they go to zero who cares with 2% of your belongings and in the event that they triple hey they tripled as a result of it was 2% if it was really all of your cash you’d by no means have been capable of maintain on that lengthy. [that’s right] You’d have taken Oh my God I’m up 30% I gotta take some income.

Brian Portnoy: And by the way in which there’s nothing mistaken with being within the inventory or bond market or in crypto or in every other market and seeing in the event you can ship carry your perception into choosing higher securities or higher outcomes.

Nonetheless if we’re actually serious about the connection between cash and happiness when you may have a nicely outlined plan it signifies that you’re heading in the direction of one thing it could possibly be your youngsters faculty training it could possibly be a snug

It could possibly be a snug retirement, it could possibly be a selected trip that you’ve in thoughts, so that you decide your aim and also you make investments accordingly. You construct a portfolio, you may have time horizons, you may have danger tolerance, it’s not as horny or as provocative as taking part in the markets so to talk however the dialog about cash and happiness really makes much more sense within the context of getting nicely outlined objectives and the opposite stuff is form of enjoyable however simply let’s name it what it’s, it’s not investing it’s speculating.

Brian Portnoy: Thanks Brian, that’s actually attention-grabbing. You realize this concept of cash shopping for happiness comes up on a regular basis it comes up in conversations with purchasers and family and friends.

I all the time wish to level to the instance of the reverse of cash resulting in satisfaction and contentment – one thing I name purposeless capital. Invoice Huang ran the hedge fund Archegos Capital Administration they usually very famously ran up a stake of a billion {dollars} utilizing leverage and really aggressive buying and selling as much as $20 billion earlier than they in the end simply blew up.  I all the time suspected a part of the explanation that occurred was as a result of this was “Purposeless Capital” – there was no intent behind it, there was no plan to satisfy sure life objectives or give cash to philanthropy, construct experiences with the household. It was simply extra for the sake of extra.

As we’ve discovered over time, extra money doesn’t all the time purchase happiness, but when used proper it might purchase experiences you possibly can assist others and it might probably carry a lifetime of funded contentment if utilized appropriately

Print Friendly, PDF & EmailPrint Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.